there are all the same
can you find the hidden pictures?
there are all the same
can you find the hidden pictures?
This Friday is Race for the Cure at SMU. I think that is such a great thing that SMU puts on an event that is for a great cause. Although I know that Race for the Cure is a fund raiser for people with breast cancer, I began thinking and realized that I do not know that much about it…how it was started, the motivation behind it etc… Race for the Cure was founded by a loving sister who lost her sister to the battle of breast cancer. That victim was Susan G. Komen. She fought her
battle and throughout her treatment tried to make life better for other women battling the same disease; she was less concerned with her self. As Susan came closer and closer to the face of death, her sister promised her that she would do everything in her power to end breast cancer. This promise became the Susan G. Komen for the Cure. It has invested more than 1.9 BILLION dollars since its origin in 1982 and is the world’s leade
r of the breast cancer movement. Moreover, it hosts the largest network of survivors and activists, worldwide.
Their mission: to find a cure. Progress over the years has led researchers to make major breakthroughs. Because of this non profit program there has been advances in understanding the biology of breast cancer and its cell division, more
efficient early detection of breast cancer, what reduces the risks as well as advances is preventing the disease all together. Today the program has invested over 450 million dollars in over a thousand research projects.
Personally, I am so excited to participate in this fundraiser this weekend. Not only is it a great cause but also when I participate, I will think of my friend’s mothers who have been affected by this disease. I am doing it for them.

I presented the research portfolio to more clearly identify all the focus points of research.

The incident that occurred over Labor Day weekend made me realize that there are consequences in being a third party; third party liability. As naïve as I was, I still had hesitations at first about doing this. However, I listened to my friends and trusted their word. I am in no way blaming them; I was as in the wrong as they were. After meeting with the conduct board, the lady realized that this was my first time getting in trouble with the school. She realized that I was punishing myself and that in itself is a far better punishment than anything she could have assigned. I decided to do some research on third party liability because that is what I was accused of; being a third party liability. I have gained a better knowledge of the consequences that are applicable in this situation that were previously unknown. Third party liability is defined as one’s legal obligations to a certain person, or entity. In essence, one can be held responsible for another’s actions even if they are not directly associated with the incident. Although there are many forms of third party liability, such as third party liability dealing with Medicare, insurance and with corporations, mine was a result of alcohol violation with Southern Methodist University. In cases specific to alcohol violations, one can be held accountable if a guest becomes intoxicated and causes damage to himself, others or property.
Lawsuits can be filed against a third party should they have an indirect relationship with damage caused to the innocent victim, or damage caused to others. Lawsuits that are filed can result in paying fines ranging in all amounts. The amounts can be in the range of the thousands to even millions of dollars. Civil law suits can be based upon three categories known as dram shop laws, common negligence, or social host.
The dram shop laws are as stated: “Specific statutes that address liability issues only for liquor license holders. These statutes are intended to promote responsible alcohol service and provide a means for third parties to file suit for injuries and for fatalities resulting from a liquor law violation.” In other words, this civil law suit is directed towards liquor license holders. It is enforced in order to keep bar owners or liquor storeowners in line with the law. The law protects minors from being over served. This way liquor storeowners will not serve to minors as a means to get more money because this law enforces responsible service. If so violated, one can be sued under the circumstances.
Another civil law suit is the common negligence law. This law is as stated: “These laws, although not specifically defined, address negligent behavior with negligence being defined as not doing what any reasonable person could be expected to do under a certain set of circumstances. With regard to alcohol, it is assumed that a person (server/seller) can be expected to follow a set of procedures and if he/she fails to do so, the server/seller has acted negligently.” In other words, one may be sued if a server or seller of alcohol does not follow the proper procedures that are needed under the circumstances. Servers and sellers of alcohol have to uphold to a certain standard. If so violated, they may be sued in the court of law.
The last civil law suit that can be filed against someone is known as the social host law. This law is as stated: Specific laws stating that social hosts (hosts of a party, function, etc.) who provide alcohol to their guests can be held responsible for the actions of their guests if alcohol has been served improperly. In essence, the host of a party (serving alcohol) can be held accountable for another person’s actions should he cause damage or harm to himself or others.
Although there are three types of civil liability, there are also forms of criminal liability as well as administrative liability. Criminal liability deals with the criminal aspect of a person’s actions whereas administrative liability concerns the actions of a server of alcohol with a permit.
Criminal liability is applicable to the actual crime of the incident.
This law brings back a dark memory from my high school. It was my senior year and a person from my high school was having a huge graduation party. Fortunately for me, I was out of town that weekend so I was unable to attend. At the party, a person in my high school became increasingly intoxicated as the night went on. without anyone noticed, he managed to get his keys and drive home. His judgment was so impaired, leading him to crash into another vehicle, at ninety miles per hour, that was stopped at a red light. The stopped car swung around and hit another car. The passenger who was directly hit was killed instantly and the passenger in the other car who was indirectly was sent into the intensive care unit. I came home to learn the a classmate of mine had been arrested for the incident. Although his case went to trial, the family members of the victim also sued the parents of the house that had the graduation party. After doing research on third liability, I have come to the realization that this family is a real example of a third party liability. Although, the parents did not directly kill the victim and cause harm and pain to others, they were at fault indirectly by supplying the alcohol. At first it was hard for me to understand the reasoning behind the parents’ fault. After all, it was the actions of my classmate that cause the death of an innocent man as well as the pain and suffering of his family. However, after researching third party liability I have a clearer understanding of the parents’ involvement in the incident.
As I thought about my classmate’s actions I realized that I was not familiar with the laws of third party liability in Florida. I decided that it would be in my best interest to research the laws of third party liability. More research was conducted in order to better understand the consequences that can occur as a result of a third party. I did research in the state of Florida and found many cases in which a third party member was convicted of a crime.
In the case known as “Ellis v. N.G.N. of Tampa, 586 So. 2d 1042, 1044 (Fla. 1991). This common law principle was first attacked by the Modern Jersey Supreme Court in Rappaport v. Nichols, 31 N.J. 188, 156 A.2d 1 (N.J. 1959).” In this case an owner of a tavern sold alcohol to a minor. The minor became intoxicated and was involved in a car accident. The car accident resulted in the death of an innocent victim, a stranger to the intoxicated minor. The tavern owner knowingly served alcohol to this minor and therefore the tavern owner was held civilly liable for the damages. This was the first time, the owner was held liable instead of the person driving the car. He was convicted because it was felt that if the owner had responded honoring his duty, the damages done to the victim and family could have been provided.
In another case known as Prevatt v. McClennan, the cause of the injury was the sale of alcohol rather than the consumption. From this point forward, alcohol related convictions would be handled differently. Third party liability have become increasingly important as they are viewed on a heavier basis.
One of Florida’s laws states: “a person who willfully and unlawfully sells or furnishes alcoholic beverages to a person who is not of lawful drinking age or who knowinglyserves a person habitually addicted to the use of any or all alcoholic beverages may become liable for injury or damage caused by or resulting from the intoxication of such minor or person.”
After my doing research on third party liabilities, I have gained a greater knowledge of the importance of a third party’s involvement. Although, you can be indirectly related to the damages and harms of others, you are still held accountable for your actions. One needs to uphold a moral understanding of what is right and if that it is broken consequences will occur. More and more people are becoming aware of this responsibility, therefore, making our everyday lives safer.

